56 results available
Sign in
Skills directory

cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-python

nvidia

·

Last changed
Hardened

This skill has been hardened by Chainguard

Last changed

This version passed the hardening gate. Hardening updated the skill content and independently checked the resulting changes. Classified findings before hardening: 5. Classified findings closed: 0. Classified findings remaining: 5. Unclassified scanner findings remaining: 0. Review findings closed: 1. Review findings remaining: 10.


Open before hardening

3

Medium

2

Low
Open after hardening

3

Medium

2

Low

Expand
File
Group
Subtype
Severity
Status
SKILL.md

Tool & MCP Manipulation

MCP over-permissioning

Medium
Open
BENCHMARK.md

Sensitive Data & Secret Exposure

Agent snooping

Medium
Open
SKILL.md

Excessive Agency & Rogue Autonomy

—

Medium
Open
benchmark/SOURCES.md

Prompt Injection

Third-party content as instructions

Low
Open
benchmark/SOURCES.md

Excessive Agency & Rogue Autonomy

—

Low
Open

5 findings


SKILL.md

cuOpt Numerical Optimization Skill (Python)

Model and solve LP, MILP, and QP problems using NVIDIA cuOpt's GPU-accelerated solver. The Python API surface (Problem, SolverSettings, solve) is shared across all three problem classes — only the objective form and a few rules change.

Before You Start

Use a formulation summary (parameters, constraints, decisions, objective) if available; otherwise ask for decision variables, objective, and constraints. Then confirm problem type (LP / MILP / QP — see below) and variable types.

Choosing LP vs MILP vs QP

Decide from the objective and variables:

If the objective is...And variables are...Use

Linear (sum of c_i * x_i)

All continuous

LP

Linear

Some integer or binary

MILP

Has squared (x*x) or cross (x*y) terms

Continuous (integer QP not supported)

QP (beta)

Prefer LP when the problem allows it. LP solves faster and has stronger optimality guarantees. Use MILP only when the problem logically requires whole numbers or yes/no decisions. Use QP only when the objective is genuinely quadratic (variance, squared error, kinetic energy).

Problem types that need extra care: Multi-period planning and goal programming are easy to misinterpret. Double-check that rates and constraints apply to the right time period or priority level.

  • Use LP when every quantity can meaningfully be fractional: flows, proportions, rates, dollars, hours, tonnes of material, etc.
  • Use MILP when the problem mentions counts of discrete entities, yes/no choices, or either/or decisions (e.g. open a facility or not, assign a person to a shift, number of trucks).
  • Use QP when the objective minimizes variance, squared error, or any expression with x*x or x*y terms (portfolio optimization, least squares, regularized regression).

Integer vs continuous from wording

Choose variable type from what the problem describes.

Problem wording / conceptVariable typeExamples

Discrete entities (counts)

INTEGER

Workers, cars, trucks, machines, pilots, facilities, units to manufacture (when "units" means whole items), trainees, vehicles

Yes/no or on/off

INTEGER (binary, lb=0 ub=1)

Open a facility, run a machine, produce a product line, assign a person to a shift

Amounts that can be fractional

CONTINUOUS

Tonnes, litres, dollars, hours, kWh, proportion of capacity, flow volume, weight

Rates or fractions

CONTINUOUS

Utilization, percentage, share of budget

Unclear

Prefer INTEGER if the noun is a countable thing (a worker, a car); prefer CONTINUOUS if it's a measure (amount of steel, hours worked). If the problem says "whole" or "integer" or "number of", use INTEGER.

Rule of thumb: If the quantity is "how many things" (people, vehicles, items, sites), use INTEGER. If it's "how much" (mass, volume, money, time) or a rate, use CONTINUOUS unless the problem explicitly requires whole numbers.

Quick Reference: Python API

LP Example

from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import Problem, CONTINUOUS, MAXIMIZE
from cuopt.linear_programming.solver_settings import SolverSettings

# Create problem
problem = Problem("MyLP")

# Decision variables
x = problem.addVariable(lb=0, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="x")
y = problem.addVariable(lb=0, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="y")

# Constraints
problem.addConstraint(2*x + 3*y <= 120, name="resource_a")
problem.addConstraint(4*x + 2*y <= 100, name="resource_b")

# Objective
problem.setObjective(40*x + 30*y, sense=MAXIMIZE)

# Solve
settings = SolverSettings()
settings.set_parameter("time_limit", 60)
problem.solve(settings)

# Check status (CRITICAL: use PascalCase!)
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "PrimalFeasible"]:
    print(f"Objective: {problem.ObjValue}")
    print(f"x = {x.getValue()}")
    print(f"y = {y.getValue()}")

MILP Example (with integer variables)

from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import Problem, CONTINUOUS, INTEGER, MINIMIZE

problem = Problem("FacilityLocation")

# Binary variable (integer with bounds 0-1)
open_facility = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=INTEGER, name="open")

# Continuous variable
production = problem.addVariable(lb=0, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="production")

# Linking constraint: can only produce if facility is open
problem.addConstraint(production <= 1000 * open_facility, name="link")

# Objective: fixed cost + variable cost
problem.setObjective(500*open_facility + 2*production, sense=MINIMIZE)

# MILP-specific settings
settings = SolverSettings()
settings.set_parameter("time_limit", 120)
settings.set_parameter("mip_relative_gap", 0.01)  # 1% optimality gap

problem.solve(settings)

# Check status
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "FeasibleFound"]:
    print(f"Open facility: {open_facility.getValue() > 0.5}")
    print(f"Production: {production.getValue()}")

QP Example (beta — MINIMIZE only)

from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import Problem, CONTINUOUS, MINIMIZE
from cuopt.linear_programming.solver_settings import SolverSettings

# Portfolio variance minimization
problem = Problem("Portfolio")
x1 = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="stock_a")
x2 = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="stock_b")
x3 = problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=CONTINUOUS, name="stock_c")

# Quadratic objective (variance) — MUST be MINIMIZE
problem.setObjective(
    0.04*x1*x1 + 0.02*x2*x2 + 0.01*x3*x3
    + 0.02*x1*x2 + 0.01*x1*x3 + 0.016*x2*x3,
    sense=MINIMIZE,
)

# Linear constraints
problem.addConstraint(x1 + x2 + x3 == 1, name="budget")
problem.addConstraint(0.12*x1 + 0.08*x2 + 0.05*x3 >= 0.08, name="min_return")

problem.solve(SolverSettings())
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "PrimalFeasible"]:
    print(f"Variance: {problem.ObjValue}")

QP rules:

  • MINIMIZE only — solver rejects MAXIMIZE for quadratic objectives. To maximize f(x), minimize -f(x).
  • Continuous variables only — integer QP is not supported.
  • Q should be PSD (positive semi-definite) for a convex problem; otherwise the solver may return a non-optimal stationary point.
  • Beta — API may evolve; treat as production-capable for typical convex QP but expect occasional changes.

See references/qp_examples.md for least-squares, maximization-workaround, and matrix-form examples.

CRITICAL: Status Checking

Status values use PascalCase, NOT ALL_CAPS:

# ✅ CORRECT
if problem.Status.name in ["Optimal", "FeasibleFound"]:
    print(problem.ObjValue)

# ❌ WRONG - will silently fail!
if problem.Status.name == "OPTIMAL":  # Never matches!
    print(problem.ObjValue)

LP Status Values: Optimal, NoTermination, NumericalError, PrimalInfeasible, DualInfeasible, IterationLimit, TimeLimit, PrimalFeasible

MILP Status Values: Optimal, FeasibleFound, Infeasible, Unbounded, TimeLimit, NoTermination

QP Status Values: Same set as LP. For QP debugging, print f"Actual status: '{problem.Status.name}'" and check that Q is PSD and variables are reasonably scaled.

Common Modeling Patterns

Binary Selection

# Select exactly k items from n
items = [problem.addVariable(lb=0, ub=1, vtype=INTEGER) for _ in range(n)]
problem.addConstraint(sum(items) == k)

Big-M Linking

# If y=1, then x <= 100; if y=0, x can be anything up to M
M = 10000
problem.addConstraint(x <= 100 + M*(1 - y))

If-then "must also produce"

When the problem says if we do X then we must also do Y, enforce both (i) the binary link and (ii) that Y is actually produced:

# y_X <= y_Y (if we do X, we must "do" Y)
problem.addConstraint(y_X <= y_Y)
# Production of Y when Y is chosen: produce at least 1 (or a minimum) when y_Y=1
problem.addConstraint(production_Y >= 1 * y_Y)  # or min_amount * y_Y

Otherwise the solver can set y_Y=1 but production_Y=0, satisfying the binary link but not the intent.

Building large expressions

Chained + over many terms can hit recursion limits in the API. Prefer building objectives and constraints with LinearExpression:

from cuopt.linear_programming.problem import LinearExpression

# Build as list of (vars, coeffs) instead of v1*c1 + v2*c2 + ...
vars_list = [x, y, z]
coeffs_list = [
    1.0,
    2.0,
    3.0,
]
expr = LinearExpression(vars_list, coeffs_list, constant=0.0)
problem.addConstraint(expr <= 100)

See reference models in this skill's assets/ for examples.

Piecewise Linear (SOS2)

# Approximate nonlinear function with breakpoints
# Use lambda variables that sum to 1, at most 2 adjacent non-zero

Solver Settings

settings = SolverSettings()

# Time limit
settings.set_parameter("time_limit", 60)

# MILP gap tolerance (stop when within X% of optimal)
settings.set_parameter("mip_relative_gap", 0.01)

# Logging
settings.set_parameter("log_to_console", 1)

Common Issues

ProblemLikely CauseFix

Status never "OPTIMAL"

Using wrong case

Use "Optimal" not "OPTIMAL"

Integer var has fractional value

Defined as CONTINUOUS

Use vtype=INTEGER

Infeasible

Conflicting constraints

Check constraint logic

Unbounded

Missing bounds

Add variable bounds

Slow solve

Large problem

Set time limit, increase gap tolerance

Maximum recursion depth

Building big expr with chained +

Use LinearExpression(vars_list, coeffs_list, constant)

QP rejected with MAXIMIZE

QP only supports MINIMIZE

Negate the objective: minimize -f(x)

QP returns non-optimal

Q not PSD or variables badly scaled

Check Q is PSD; rescale variables to similar magnitudes

Getting Dual Values (LP / QP)

Duals and reduced costs are returned for LP and QP. They are not returned for a problem with quadratic constraints (every value comes back as NaN), so read them only when all constraints are linear. MILP returns no duals.

if problem.Status.name == "Optimal":
    constraint = problem.getConstraint("resource_a")   # linear constraint
    print(f"Dual value: {constraint.DualValue}")       # NaN if the model has quadratic constraints

Reference Models

All reference models live in this skill's assets/ directory. Use them as reference when building new applications; do not edit them in place.

Minimal / canonical examples (LP, MILP, QP)

ModelTypeDescription

lp_basic

LP

Minimal LP: variables, constraints, objective, solve

lp_duals

LP

Dual values and reduced costs

lp_warmstart

LP

PDLP warmstart for similar problems

milp_basic

MILP

Minimal MIP; includes incumbent callback example

milp_production_planning

MILP

Production planning with resource constraints

portfolio

QP

Minimize portfolio variance; budget and min-return constraints

least_squares

QP

Minimize (x-3)² + (y-4)² (closest point)

maximization_workaround

QP

Maximize quadratic via minimize -f(x)

Other reference

ModelTypeDescription

mps_solver

LP/MILP

Solve any problem from standard MPS file format

Quick command to list models: ls assets/ (from this skill's directory).

When to Escalate

Use troubleshooting and diagnostic guidance if:

  • Infeasible and you can't determine why
  • Numerical issues

Install

Install with chainctl
chainctl skill install public/nvidia/cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-python:latest
Get started with chainctl
View source

Harden your own skills

Bring Chainguard's hardening pipeline to your first-party skills — custom rulesets, automated remediation, full audit trail.

Provenance

Upstream sourcehttps://github.com/nvidia/skills
Upstream commit2956a3800e536ac774dcaf74c8c71b3d3c1ba82e
OCI reference

skills.cgr.dev/public/github.com/nvidia/skills/cuopt-numerical-optimization-api-python:latest

License

Apache-2.0

Files

BENCHMARK.md

HARDENING.md

LICENSE

SKILL.md

assets/README.md

assets/least_squares/README.md

assets/least_squares/model.py

assets/lp_basic/README.md

assets/lp_basic/model.py

assets/lp_duals/README.md

assets/lp_duals/model.py

assets/lp_warmstart/README.md

assets/lp_warmstart/model.py

assets/maximization_workaround/README.md

assets/maximization_workaround/model.py

assets/milp_basic/README.md

assets/milp_basic/incumbent_callback.py

assets/milp_basic/model.py

assets/milp_production_planning/README.md

assets/milp_production_planning/model.py

assets/mps_solver/README.md

assets/mps_solver/data/README.md

assets/mps_solver/data/sample.mps

assets/mps_solver/model.py

assets/mps_solver/results.md

assets/portfolio/README.md

assets/portfolio/model.py

benchmark/SOURCES.md

benchmark/evals.json

evals/evals.json

references/qp_examples.md

skill-card.md

skill.oms.sig


The trusted source for open source

Talk to an expert
PrivacyTerms

Product

Chainguard ContainersChainguard LibrariesChainguard VMsChainguard OS PackagesChainguard ActionsChainguard Agent SkillsIntegrationsPricing
© 2026 Chainguard, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Chainguard® and the Chainguard logo are registered trademarks of Chainguard, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
The other respective trademarks mentioned on this page are owned by the respective companies and use of them does not imply any affiliation or endorsement.