·
Last changedVersion:
This version passed the hardening gate. Hardening applied 4 targeted changes and preserved all other text. Classified findings before hardening: 3. Classified findings closed: 3. Classified findings remaining: 0. Unclassified scanner findings remaining: 0. Review findings closed: 7. Review findings remaining: 8.
1
2
None
Expand | File | Group | Subtype | Severity | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKILL.md | Supply Chain & Install-Time Trust | Dependency or plugin compromise | Medium | Closed | |
SKILL.md | Malicious Code & Command Execution | — | Low | Closed | |
SKILL.md | Supply Chain & Install-Time Trust | Install-time download and execute | Low | Closed |
3 findings
Research topic: $ARGUMENTS
ONLY use this skill when the user explicitly requests deep/exhaustive research. It can take several minutes and costs more than a quick search, depending on the processor and task. For normal "research X" requests, quick lookups, or fact-checking, use parallel-web-search instead.
Choose a descriptive output base in a persistent directory (e.g., reports/ai-chip-market-2026). Include the returned run ID to make it unique, then use this base in step 2 as -o "$FILENAME". Check for existing .json and .md files before saving.
The --text flag tells the API to return a markdown report (with inline citations) when the task completes, instead of the default structured JSON. Use it for narrative/report-style requests, which is what most users want from "deep research." Drop --text if the user explicitly wants structured JSON output.
Optional with --text: pass --text-description "Keep under 1500 words, focus on M&A activity" to steer length, format, or focus.
If this is a follow-up and you have a prior Task's returned interaction_id, add context chaining. An enrichment taskgroup_id and a Search/Extract session_id are not Task interaction IDs. Async enrichment does not return a new interaction ID; retain the prior Task ID instead. Context chaining is unavailable for Zero Data Retention (ZDR) accounts, so omit it there and provide the needed context explicitly.
This reuses the prior Task's context. A lighter processor (lite-fast or base-fast) can suit a focused follow-up; choose based on the new question's depth rather than assuming all follow-ups are simple.
Always use --no-wait to separate creation from bounded polling. Save the returned IDs immediately. If creation is interrupted or its response is lost, do not submit a replacement until you have checked whether the first task was created.
Use pro-fast by default for exploratory research. Run parallel-cli research processors for the installed CLI's processor list and latency estimates; these are not deadlines. Choose ultra tiers only when explicitly requested and within the user's approved budget. Check current pricing rather than quoting fixed cost multipliers.
Fast variants prioritize speed and may use less fresh indexed data. Standard variants may suit freshness-sensitive work, but neither choice guarantees that every source was fetched live. State the relevant date or freshness requirement in the research prompt and check the returned evidence.
Parse the JSON output to save run_id, interaction_id, and result_url. Immediately tell the user:
The task runs server-side; polling can resume later using the saved run_id.
Important:
--timeout 60 allows progress updates between waits.--json when polling a large report. The -o flag saves the full result to files.-o "$FILENAME":
$FILENAME.json is always written (metadata + basis)$FILENAME.md is written only for returned text output, normally requested with --text; auto-schema results can remain JSON-only.output.content_file relative to the saved JSON file instead of duplicating the report body.--force is explicit. Prefer a new base; use --force only when overwriting those files is intended.Timeout exit 5 or interruption ends the local wait, not necessarily the server task. Check the saved task:
Resume the same poll only for a pending/running task; retrieve completed output and report failed/cancelled or action_required states accurately. The CLI's polling loop may not recognize action_required, so do not poll that state indefinitely. Never recreate the task merely because a local wait ended.
After step 1: Share the monitoring URL for tracking progress.
After step 2:
.md path, if a text report exists.json path with metadata and basis (and structured content for JSON output)interaction_id and tell the user they can ask follow-up questions that build on this research (e.g., "drill deeper into X" or "compare that to Y")After completion, link the saved files rather than repeating the monitoring URL.
Avoid loading the whole report into context. Read only the relevant sections when answering a requested summary or follow-up, and cite the returned sources.
Remember the interaction_id: use it for a related research or enrichment follow-up when context chaining is supported by the account.
For authentication or API errors, inspect the returned message. A 403 can indicate permissions, account policy or billing; it does not prove low balance. Check parallel-cli auth --json and its authenticated boolean when relevant without exposing credentials. Only a billing-specific error warrants a balance check, and adding funds needs explicit confirmation. Reuse saved task IDs; do not automatically retry an ambiguous creation.
Get started with chainctlchainctl skill install public/parallel-web/parallel-deep-research:latest
Bring Chainguard's hardening pipeline to your first-party skills — custom rulesets, automated remediation, full audit trail.
skills.cgr.dev/public/github.com/parallel-web/skills/parallel-deep-research:latest
MIT
HARDENING.md
LICENSE
SKILL.md